A case was brought on his behalf because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed against him and other problems that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It is thought that this is only done so that the Supreme Court wouldn’t normally hear the case due to the fact Bush Administration will have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed that had to complete using the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been faced with lesser much less crimes that are specific Attorney General Ashcroft had stated as he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. He was subjected to and the length of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that because of the torture. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to increase it towards the 8th of December, giving the power towards the Federal Bureau of Investigation and lots of other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights. February 28th, 2011 was thought to be the final day associated with Patriot Act since no new legislation had been passed. With this extension, America waits for hearings to be held by the Judiciary Committee. It and Democrats argued against the extension when it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted for. However, the thing that was a surprise to numerous was the proven fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension of this Patriot Act. One out of particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the highest democrat that is ranking the Intelligence Committee, wish to see this extension all of the way right through to 2013. Many of the 27 Republicans who voted contrary to the extension, such as for example Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American individuals will face the best threat of out-of-control prosecutions along with the chance of out-of-control spy networks taking effect.
Groups such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform for the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take benefit of the balance and employ for this power to trouble innocent members of the communities that are muslim-American. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared before the House subcommittee on the need for reform of the Patriot Act, arguing that the federal government tabs on communications without any proof is a violation for the American peoples’ basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt that he will never support the extension as it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to obtain reports on intelligence law violations through the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on one or more occasion to your Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to report to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the charged power for the Patriot Act.
for instance, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens looking to gain permanent residency, citizenship, visas and work permits in the usa are being scrutinized underneath the new requirement system of the Patriot Act. One very high ranking official in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) caused it to be clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More stringent government standards and thorough criminal record checks are simply another obstacle produced by the Patriot Act. professional college essay help These new rules under the Patriot Act also not in favor of all of the checks and balances from the Bill of Rights that has been placed into place to protect citizens’ privacy. At that moment, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, such as the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens using the internet in the privacy of their home feel a discomfort with what they are doing because their actions are susceptible to review if the government suspects these are typically participating in anything terrorist related. For online users, it opens the doorway for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and systems that are peer-to-peer. Also place in the center of the arguments are companies and public libraries that have to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, during the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification to their customers.
In my opinion that certain facets of the Patriot Act are feasible, but only with intensive oversight not merely from Congress, but also from the Supreme Court. Congress can play a role by ensuring that the laws they pass usually do not go against the protections promised to Americans in the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of this Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue to review cases to ensure that the Constitution is upheld even though it comes down to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which are American citizens. Our laws are making this country what it really is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, liberty and property has changed into greed. Terrorist acts up against the US terrify many Americans, but in many cases, power and money scares them more. The people vote to have government representation but the people need to be more associated with your decision making process. In the event that you elect anyone to office plus they do not perform the job correctly, it is as much as us as Americans to ensure that those individuals usually do not stay static in office. That can only be done if people get more involved in the political process and not merely be satisfied with what goes on.
The expression “land associated with free” is used too generously. Just how it is currently, the Patriot Act goes against precisely what this country stands for and deprives all of us of our civil liberties. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. If the Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the individuals it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president really should not be the factor that is deciding deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving an individual such a title strips them of basic human rights. If it’s unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the individuals of the world they truly are occupying, it must be unacceptable for authorities to make use of tactics which can be considered torture when wanting to elicit information from a person, whether that person be an American citizen or perhaps not.
The History associated with the Patriot Act actually goes back to the century that is eighteenth different laws put in place during war time for you to protect the US.
The protection of our nation is the highest and the most responsibility that is important of government. The laws created are meant to be into the best interest regarding the citizens. In the end, the citizens supply the government the ability to provide for their welfare and also to protect them. People with this amount of power sometimes concentrate on the entire without rational additionally the individual has got to pay the cost. There should be a limit from the power associated with government, if the way that is nation’s of, liberty and quest for property come in jeopardy we must look at the rational the government uses when governing this nation. We can’t as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being carried out. To be able to elicit change, we need to remain true and do something about it.
